Vaccine: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sanofi-pasteur/5283533286/ |
The CDC went live with VMBIP, the
Vaccine Management Business Improvement Project in Febrary 2007, deploying in a
step-wise fashion over a little bit more than a year. [1] This program
consolidated a scattered and inefficient supply chain into a more simple and
streamlined state designed to be more responsive to providers and hopefully
more fault-tolerant.
In an article on VMBIP’s genesis and
deployment “Smarter
Medicine” the CDC observed that there was a great deal of resistance to the
notion of a centralized ordering process for vaccine. Rather than have
end-point providers order directly from a single source, local health
departments instead preferred to field and process orders themselves so that
they could preserve direct contact with the providers and capitalize on
opportunities to continue to promote new vaccine programs and evolving
practice. Rather than push the issue, the CDC prudently decided to let that
component of existing process remain intact. In the longer run, however, it is
clear that preserving an extra step in the order process is not only
inefficient but also preserves an opportunity to introduce error and delay in
the process.
Unsurprisingly, the CDC appears to have seen
things in a similar light, and is working actively to remove that intermediate
step with their Vaccine
Tracking System to which they have attached the typically unwieldy acronym “VTrckS.”
Launched December 2010, VTrckS “allows health
care providers to input their vaccine requests (orders) directly online thereby improving efficiency and accountability of
public dollars,” [2] that is, it does exactly what the CDC proposed initially
with its centralized call center. (Italics
mine.)
This system is the next step in the CDC’s transformation of its childhood
vaccine supply chain allowing it more direct control over the supply process
and optimal delivery sizes. Direct order entry also increases visibility of the
ordering and distribution process for both supplier and recipient.
From a change management perspective, one might reasonably argue that delay
in implementation of a centralized ordering clearinghouse cost the CDC nothing:
it would have taken time to design the system and bring it online in any event,
and clearly the first order of business was consolidation of the supply chain.
Additionally, it is likely that had they pushed the issue at the outset of the
VMBIP program, they would have encountered resistance from local health
departments, possibly jeopardizing the entire initiative.
Question:
The CDC delayed implementation of a
centralized ordering clearinghouse initially because of pushback from local
health departments. How are the same departments responding now, five year
later?
References:
[1] Copeland, M.V. (August 26,
2008) “Smarter Medicine” Strategy + Business. Retrieved 25 August 2012 from http://www.strategy-business.com/article/08307.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.