Opening of ceremony of a newly opened Bharti Wal-Mart store in Hyderabad in 2010
The Indian government recently passed
an executive order permitting up to 51% FDI in multi-brand retail and 100%
investment in single-brand retail. It was a bold step considering the
resistance it had to face from opposition parties and from within its own
allies who were concerned about potential death of the local
kirana stores. While not getting
into the politics behind it, I want to talk about the technical and policy
reasons behind the government’s decision. The primary driver behind the
legislation has been the currently inefficient supply chain of food (fruits, vegetables,
crops etc.) in India.
A typical Kirana store
The
government bases its side of the story on three key changes that they think
this new policy would bring:
1.
Better prices for farmers
2.
Lesser wastage of food
3.
Lower prices for the consumers
Currently, farmers sell their
produce at government owned wholesale vegetable markets. It then goes to local
vegetable markets from where it gets picked up by various vegetable sellers and
kirana store owners. Because there
are so many middlemen involved in the whole process, a very little amount of
what the customer pays actually goes to the farmer. Most of it is shared by the
politically strong and influential middlemen. This means that the farmer is not
only inadequately compensated, he is left at the mercy of the prices decided at
the wholesale vegetable markets. Of course, all this is not so simple but gives
a rough picture of current state of affairs. Government estimates that entry of
Walmarts et al would lead to them negotiating directly with the farmers. This
would lead to better prices for the farmers and lower prices for the consumers.
A traditional wholesale food market in Guwahati, India
A fruits seller in New Delhi, India
India has an archaic
supply chain for crops. In 2010, government reported an estimated loss of 250,000
– 1 million tons of food grain loss due to inefficient warehouses and storage.
The situation is worse for fruits and vegetables. India has one of the most
inadequate cold chains which lead to huge losses. A KPMG
report puts the losses from farm to fork anywhere between 30 – 40%. Although
India is the world’s second largest fruit and vegetable producer (134.5 million
tons), cold storage facilities are available only for 10% of the produce. The government
was traditionally the only player in the warehousing, distribution and storage
market but it is evident now that it has not been doing its job well at all.
Also, the investment and management expertise needed to run these areas are absent.
It estimates that having modern supply chains would lead to a drastic lesser
wastage of food.
This is where the strength of supply chains of the Walmarts
and the Carrefours come in. The government predicts that if these giants have
to perform well and make positive RoIs in India, they’d have to invest heavily
in the supply chains. This is where they’ll make use of their expertise in
management and their deep pockets. Of course, it has left the doors open for
Public-Private Partnerships. The
government also predicts that apart from modernizing the supply chains, these
companies would need to have lower prices for the consumers if they have to
survive in the competitive Indian market. With so many difficulties against it,
why would the retail giants want to do it? Simple answer: Indian retail
market is estimated US$450 bn (top five in the world), and more significantly,
one
of the fastest growing in the world.
Not only food but companies like IKEA and Apple have shown
significant interest in entering the Indian market. I’ll end up with one question that has kept bothering me for
some time now and I’d love to hear your opinion on:
For the end-customer, do you think the prices would be lower
as the government predicts or will the creation and handling of the modern
supply chain mean that the prices may finally end up increasing?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.