It is obvious that manufacturing jobs have been coming back
to the US from around world from early 2010. However, what remains debatable is
whether it is a short-term effect or the beginning of a long-term
de-globalization for the manufacturing world.
Big names including Whirlpool, GE and Apple have been on the
long list of companies who shifted at least parts of their manufactory lines
back to the US. More and more companies thing about taking job back home from
developing countries mainly due to the economic consideration. The cost
benefits for manufacturing companies have shrink to a surprising extent that
Apple would consider hiring workers to assemble Macs in California!
Major incentives for this insourcing wave include the
increasing workers’ wages in China and Southeast Asia, soaring price of gas,
intellectual property concerns and environmental awareness. Among these
factors, economic consideration still plays a dominant role when companies
develop their global strategies.
Therefore, the insourcing trend seems inevitable as the
costs of oil and labor continue to rise around the developing world. However,
some would still argue that manufacturing may required relatively more skilled
workers in the future, when robots can easily substitute for low-skill jobs,
and it’s still much more cost effectively to hire skilled labors in the
developing world, as education has been made available to many more people in
those countries. As a result, it is still to early to draw a conclusion now.
Reference: http://bx.businessweek.com/supply-chain-performance/view?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.supplychainmusings.com%2F2012%2F12%2Fthe-new-manufacturing-destination.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.