One
of the main issues discussed in Capgemini’s “2016 Future Supply Chain” report
is the impact of lead-time reduction on improving supply chain networks. In a
perfect world, lead-time of a supply chain would be zero; orders are being
filled instantly, thus there is no inventory. If it was the perfect world, the
business would need no warehouse to keep the inventory, no staff to transport
the products to warehouses, thus less costs.
However, the real world is not perfect, and the lead-time is not zero.
Thus reducing lead-time in product replacement plays a crucial role in
improving supply chain networks.
The
importance of reducing lead-time comes from the ability to answer the market
demand on time. When a business minimizes the lead-time, the time from the
production of a good until the customer gets it decreases. In this way, market
responsiveness increases along with the shelf availability of the product.
While
in today’s world, it is considered that moving production to China is the best
way to improve the lead-time by lowering costs; there are many ways to do so.
Simplifying the infrastructure and reducing inventory are some of them. Another
way is to redesign the existing products and to provide direct supply from the
production. K’Nex is one of the few companies that have recently brought
production back to US. [1] Their main reason to do so is the market
responsiveness; when the production is physically closer to the market, it is
easier to reduce the lead-time, thus answer the demand faster.
While the market
demand was an important factor for K’Nex to move back to US, costs associates
with the production were a challenge at first. At that point, they redesigned
the products to reduce the labor requirements and the lead-time. Despite the
challenges, K’Nex strategy to moving the production back to US and reducing
lead-time is working quite well; the total employment rate has grown 30% over
the last four years. But still, there is a long way to go; while moving the
production closer to the market can decrease the lead-time, the suppliers of
the production are not moving with the business. Hence, the future supply chain
is more of a balance between the production and the supply. So, would we see
any more business bringing their productions closer to the markets along with
the suppliers, or would suppliers stay where the labor is cheaper?
1-
“K'Nex Sees Opportunity for Faster
Responsiveness, but there are Challenges; Finding Suppliers is Hard” http://www.scdigest.com/ontarget/13-03-12-2.php?cid=6821
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.