I work in Procurement or more specifically ‘Spend
Management’. I’ve led over 100 sourcing
projects where our team engaged a supply base for a commoditized bid. We stayed on board through the point of
awarding the project and contracting.
Rarely do I ever get to stay engaged through implementation or
purchasing/receiving the goods or services.
From my personal experience the couple projects that I have working on
that had inventory constraints during the Request for Proposal (RFP) were MRO
projects – Maintenance, Repair and Operations.
The first one I can recall was at a large aerospace
manufacturing facility in Wichita, Kansas.
Think of all of the tools that need to be available to make planes, run
the equipment, and general maintenance of the facility. We tried to track down a list of goods that
were needed, what amounts are purchased on an annual basis, and probably the
most difficult task – in what quantities these items were purchased in. Rope and wire are sold by the foot. Bolts, nuts, and screws can be sold in any
given amount. Tools like drills and
hammers were needed individually or by the dozens. It’s a daunting task to create a master data
file to understand the needs of the operations then create a pricing template
for the supply base to quote. This is
where it’s wise to work with a strategic vendor to get the team what they need,
when they need it. A company like
Grainger comes to mind. They will help
set up a storeroom within your walls and supply everything you need either at
that exact time or the next day. A
downside of this is they become very sticky to your operations and eventually
take over jobs that were originally in-house.
Recently, I worked with a facilities department that was
very forward thinking and knew that partnering with Grainger was a way to
reduce costs associated with POs for these purchases and the time spent on
getting it right internally. They
decided to move forward with Grainger vending machines in their storeroom that
maintenance workers could use to check out an item or get a roll of tape or a
box of nails. This allows them to build
a database of what is getting used, how often, and what quantities over a given
time period. Their close working
relationship with Grainger allows them to reduce costs of core items and all of
the equipment needed is free through the program.
MRO for a facility maintenance organization or manufacturing
facility can amount to a large chunk of change.
There are few advantages to stock your shelves with inventory when you
can partner with a large distribution company that can have what you need on
hand or the next day. The downfalls are
that you are now in bed with the partner of your choosing, usually for a long
term contract. Another could be
eliminating jobs of possible union workers who managed the tool crib in the
past – something most hold very close to their heart.
As you can see, there are pros and cons of going about MRO
inventory from either direction – RFP or partnership. If your data is tight on historic spend and
volumes, it’s easy to take it out to bid to find the right fit. If not, it’s best to work with one of the industry
leaders in this space. Two other commodities
that this approach works for are Office Supplies and Lab Supplies
Based on the facts below – how would you tackle your MRO
inventory if you managed operations at a manufacturing facility? I lean toward putting it in the hands of the
professionals – with a tight contract, revisiting of core items, and an out
clause once the process is perfected.
“Each $1.0 million in MRO
spend creates approximately 3,500 purchase order cycles (issues, receipts, POs,
invoices) relating to MRO. At a cost of $57 each (based on Aberdeen Group
estimates), the paper burden is almost $200,000, or 20 percent of each $1
million spent on MRO, plus the cost of dealing with hundreds of suppliers.”
http://www.sdcexec.com/article/10231930/mro-the-last-bastion-of-uncontrolled-expense
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.