Some of this week’s articles talked about the increasing
cost of outsourcing and offshoring. However, even though the cost of
outsourcing and offshoring is going up, many companies still pay less for
outsourcing and offshoring than for manufacturing products in their own
countries. Thus, outsourcing and offshoring are still the main methods for
companies to cut off cost. Nowadays, since the price of oil keeps growing, when
companies do outsourcing and offshoring, they need to consider some strategies in
order to obtain the maximum profit.
After reading an article called “Is it time to rethink your
manufacturing strategy”, which focused on how manufacturers should choose their
factory location and change their production mode facing the fact that oil price
is high, I got a deeper understand about it. This article gives readers three
cost-optimization realities. They are “regional distribution centers become
more attractive” which talked about companies should consider tradeoffs among
cost of oil, cost of inventory and cost of production, “Sourcing and production
may need to move closer to demand”, which advocates that manufacturers should move
their manufacturing facilities in the country where the cost is relatively low
and which is near to demand market, for example, some manufacturers move their
factories from Asia to Mexico, “Supply chain flexibility becomes more critical”,
which indicates that manufacturing companies should abandon the traditional
method called dedicated manufacturing.
The third one attracts me because it proposed a theory that
I never heard. In the IT industry, manufacturers always use dedicated
manufacturing to produce products. For example, an Iphone has about 16 suppliers;
each provides a different part of the mobile phone. All these suppliers use
dedicated manufacturing to produce these parts. This strategy is useful because
manufacturers do not need to switch between different products and can reduce
the cost of production. However, since the oil price keeps increasing, dedicated
manufacturing will cause long delivery and high transportation fees. There is a
chance that the transportation fees may exceeds what the manufacturers save in
dedicated manufacturing. Thus, manufacturers need to balance between these
costs. A flexible manufacturing strategy, on the contrary, is that a plant can
produce all or almost all kinds of products. This strategy requires set-ups to
switch between different kinds of products. Of course it will generate some expenditure
but it is almost certain to reduce transportation cost. Focusing on the
economic environment and world situation, it seems that manufacturers need to
change their strategy from dedicated to flexible. Moreover, flexible manufacturing
may be optimal for minimizing supply chain disruptions caused by natural
disasters such as the April 2010 volcanic eruptions in Iceland, the March 2011
tsunami in Japan and the August 2011 flooding in Thailand.
Finally, although flexible manufacturing strategy seems to
be the best option for today’s manufacturers, there is still a problem: what if
the nature of the products does not suit for flexible manufacturing. If this is
the case, then what other ways can manufacturers use to deduce the growing cost
caused by oil price?
Reference:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete