We work hard to conceive of new ideas. This is always
something that we couple with the pressing need to make creative stuff that
meets the customer’s objectives. The key thing here is not to look down on an
imitated design; rather, I believe that many of us are simply finding similar
ways to solve problems. If an individual visited half-dozen restaurants and
asked for a rich, filling, tomato-based dish containing pasta, odds are high
that in many instances, she would be presented with spaghetti or some variation
of it. This notion is not being presented as an excuse, but rather as a
sensation that I believe we may all be experiencing more and more these days.
(And I suspect that we’ll be feeling it with greater regularity in years to
come.
Few are interested in something that works well, when the
promise of something new is present. That is the driving force for innovation.
The article cited here also lays some industry-specific blame on the
advertising and design awards which the industry holds in such high regard.
What is the design worthiness of utilitarian pieces which pay no attention to
the principles of visual balance and materiality? A good example of this would
be an ugly, photocopied “30% off” coupon on canary yellow copy paper. This is
the kind of thing that one would hardly want to reference as a product of their
creative output; however, should it increase sales for a local “mom & pop”
diner, wouldn’t it be better designed than something more handsome (and
original) that resulted in no benefit to the client or end consumer?
Designers should always be expanding their knowledge of
design, history, popular culture, politics, music, art, social conditions;
moreover, we have to try to understand what motivates our own human
interaction. This cumulative knowledge and experience is what helps us build
more insightful design.
Everyone wants to be an innovator. We have to ask ourselves the question-What’s more important to us as an industry? Utility in design or the thrill of innovation? This discussion leaves us with a very open ended question- So
what if similar notions may have been explored before? What is to be lost if
the typography we employ isn’t the most innovative treatment imagined? So long
as it’s effective in accomplishing what was required from the effort, perhaps
we have performed as well as one should expect. I may not need my new home to
be built in the most innovative fashion imaginable, but I certainly would
appreciate that the architect had planned around my needs and expectations, and
delivered accordingly.
Not much if you ask me. Imitation is the best form of
flattery. I would like to cite the example of Ford Fusion –a mid-size car which
has generated a lot of debate in recent times because of its Aston Martin
resemblance. You might just feel like you are buying a piece of super car
without shelling out over $100k.
Source :
http://www.ideasonideas.com/2006/03/is_originality_superfluous/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.