Assessing Company Health with the Inventory Turnover Ratio
Among other measures of company success, a high level of
inventory turnover is indicative of a firm that effectively manages its supply
chain by minimizing the level of excess stock at any given time. The benefits
of a high turnover rate are twofold: first, there is a high opportunity cost
associated with keeping revenue invested in inventory as opposed to other, more
profitable financial instruments. A
company that invests 25% of its revenue in keeping inventory is making a
relative loss to a company that can keep only 15% of its revenue in inventory
and invest the 10% differential in stocks or bonds. Second, in rapidly evolving
industries —like technology or healthcare— inventory may quickly become
obsolete. This rapid depreciation of held inventory, especially in the face of
disruptive innovation, can be crippling for companies that fail to adapt to
shifting market conditions.[1]
To dig a little deeper into the validity of the inventory
turnover ratio as a measure of company health, we have to examine its correlation
to other health indicators. We will examine the eight largest firms by revenue in
the information technology sector in the US.[2][3]
For the reasons outlined above, the IT sector is often touted as the poster
child for an extremely high average industry turnover ratio. [4]
To make our assessment will consider year-over-year operating income percentage,
year-over-year free cash flow growth percentage, and operating margin
percentage as our basic indicators of company health. While there are a myriad
of potential metrics to choose from, these all do a good job of capturing
company growth, while controlling for size.
Before diving into the numbers, it is worth noting that
Apple is recognized for having not only one of the best turnover rates in the
Information Technology sector, but one of the best turnover rates of any
company in any sector.[5]
While Apple is obviously an industry leader in many aspects of the Information
Technology sector, is its high level of turnover correlated to our selected
measures of company health more than for other tech industry giants?
Indicators of Company Health
Company
|
Turnover Ratio (avg. '04-'13)
|
Turnover Rank
|
Operating Income %
|
OI% Rank
|
Avg. FCF Growth %
|
FCF rank
|
Avg. Operating Margin %
|
Rank
|
Average Rank (b)
|
Apple
|
68.74
|
1
|
56.3
|
1
|
116.8
|
1
|
21.69
|
4
|
2
|
Amazon.com
|
10.61
|
6
|
15.64
|
4
|
No Data
|
N/A
|
3.65
|
7
|
5.5
|
Google
|
48.2 (a)
|
2
|
48.4
|
2
|
61.48
|
2
|
29.77
|
2
|
2
|
HP
|
11.85
|
5
|
20.55
|
3
|
14.89
|
3
|
5.64
|
6
|
4
|
IBM
|
20.71
|
3
|
7.05
|
6
|
3.87
|
6
|
15.73
|
5
|
5.67
|
Intel
|
4.89
|
7
|
6.36
|
7
|
8.37
|
5
|
25.7
|
3
|
5
|
Microsoft
|
12.55
|
4
|
14.1
|
5
|
8.62
|
4
|
35.53
|
1
|
3.33
|
a) Google only has turnover ratio information for 2012 and
2013.
b) Average Rank is the mean of all non-Turnover Ratio ranks.
A cursory glance at the above table is enough to establish
that there is at least a moderate correlation between turnover ratio and our
chosen indicators of company health. Apple and Google share the top spot both
of which have a much higher turnover ratio than the other companies on the
list. The biggest surprise is probably IBM’s low overall ranking: despite being
third overall in turnover ratio, it is ranked last by the average of all other
indicators. And, as always, correlation is not causation; many of these indicators
may covariate with other variables which were not included in our analysis.
Nonetheless, the evidence is good that there is at least
some positive relationship between turnover ratio and overall company health
(at least in the tech sector). Ultimately, this study could be expanded by
performing a more robust regression analysis with a large number of companies
in different sectors.
Questions:
We chose to examine only companies from the Information
Technology sector for this post. How does the importance of the turnover
ratio changes when looking at other sectors? Are there any sectors for which a high
turnover ratio may actually be a bad thing?
How well do the indicators above do at capturing the concept
of “company health”? Are there other factors that should be included?
[1]
For more reading on disruptive innovation, see Clayton Christensen’s seminal The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New
Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. 1997
[2]
All financial data are taken from the Morningstar Financials website. <http://financials.morningstar.com/>
[3] We
have excluded Dell from this analysis, because its status as a private company
makes accurate financial data scarce.
[4] www.csimarket.com lists the top five
industries by inventory turnover ratio as:
Industry
|
Average industry Turnover Ratio (COGS)
|
Transportation
|
32.28
|
Services
|
30.45
|
Energy
|
14.85
|
Information Technology
|
10.57
|
Consumer Discretionary
|
8.59
|
[5] http://appleinsider.com/articles/12/05/31/apple_turns_over_entire_inventory_every_five_days
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.