Sourcing is another decision that is added to the supply
chain. This variable needs to include
numerous discussions in order to determine which type of sourcing is best for
the company: outsource, internal source, captive offshoring or offshore
outsourcing. Below is a table that
describes each of these sourcing options:
Work conducted in foreign markets
|
Captive offshoring
|
Offshore outsourcing
|
Work conducted in domestic markets
|
Internal sourcing
|
Outsourcing
|
Work conducted within company
|
Work conducted
by outside supplier
|
Table 1:
Source: https://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cbmp/content/28911835
In the article 10
Fascinating Facts About the Hidden Industry that Touches 90% of What You Own,
it states “it is cheaper for Scotland to send its cod 10000 miles over to China
to be filleted and returned to Scotland” [instead of filleting their own fish].
We can tell that Scotland either
outsources or captive offshores this process. At first, it seems like it would
be more efficient to keep the fish in Scotland and find someone to fillet them
there, but the fact is shipping is dirt cheap and labor laws are different in
each country throughout the world. That
company can then save hundreds of thousands of dollars by moving the fillet
process to another country. Some argue
that outsourcing is terrible as countries lose jobs within their own
homeland. Others fire back saying that
companies are saving money by outsourcing and can spend the same money on hiring
other employees, providing internships, or even scholarships in their
homelands.(Hargreaves, 2012).
Theoretically, this would be the ideal case if a company were to
outsource, but many companies do not use the saved money to hire new employees
or to increase scholarship opportunities.
Of course, there are other areas that need to be considered
besides cost when a company decides where and with who to outsource. Now, ability to innovate, skill set, and
security are also topics of concerns. (Sperline, 2008). Think about how much the environment changes
year to year. It sure appears the amount of natural disasters are increasing
and seasons are more variable each year. This must play an effect when a firm
is deciding the length of a contract with its suppliers.
I end this blog with a few questions to consider. With the increase in technology and natural
disasters, can firms accurately predict which products will be bettered
outsource verses in-house? Will firms be
able to bounce back if a natural disaster hits their plant?
References
Hargreaves, S. (2012, September 14). CNN.
Retrieved from The case for outsourcing jobs:
http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/14/news/economy/outsourcing-jobs/
Sperline, E. (2008, September 15). Forbes.
Retrieved from It's Not Jst About Cheap Labor.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.