The
supply chain networks around the world are facing the challenge of cost
optimization. Both private and public sectors are trying to develop a cost
effective and effective supply chain network. The public sector is doing this
to save the tax payers money while the private sector is doing it, just to
maintain its market share and profits. Recently, the increasing cost of fuel is fueling the rise in production and transportation cost.
The analysis of Apple's supply chain network, gives us an insight to these issues.In the case of Apple, the burden of high transportation and labor cost
can be absorbed by high margins already in place. But the main problem lies
with suppliers of Apple. Foxconn
is competing with many other companies. This mean it has to keep its cost lower
than other companies. It have decided to relocate their manufacturing further
inland to reduce the cost of manufacturing. But it won’t help them in the long
learn because the fuel is short in this world and the fuel cost is rising every
year. This means that it has to pay extra for the cost of transportation in
the future. In my country that is Pakistan, the cost of supplying a new car in
a different city is different and sometimes the difference is five times between
different cities. So according to this thing, the transportation cost is going
to be a major factor. We can say here that the cost of transportation varies with
volume of the good being transported. But if you move your plant further inland,
the supplies to run the plant will become more difficult to provide. So this
also needs to be considered.
There
are three major developments in the Foxconn and Apple relationship. In March 2012,
apple decided to help Foxconn to meet the demand of its workers and solve their
problem. That means the company has to increase the cost of manufacturing. This
effect is visible when Foxconn decided to freeze the recruitment of more workers
this year after the drop in the sales of iPhone 5. Moreover, Apple has indicated
that it is going to transfer some of its computer manufacturing back to its U.S.
plant. That means the company is feeling the heat of transportation and increasing labor costs on the
supply chain network.
Is
it only because of these two reasons or it is because of some other reason? According to some experts there is a fear
among many big manufacturers that your supplier in Asia becomes your competitor
after some time. They bring out the examples of HTC, Acer and Huawei to prove their point. This might also be the
reason for the apple’s decision to gradually move or diversify its supply chain
network. Moreover, Apple might be trying to diversify its supplier network to
break even any sudden change in transportation cost owing to the sudden rise in
fuel prices or to safeguard itself in case of some major catastrophe in the
world very similar to the one happened in Japan in 2012.
References:
1)http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/21/the-future-of-foxconn-the-birds/
2)http://finance.yahoo.com/news/secure-future-foxconn-branches-beyond-174547409.html
3)http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/29/us-apple-foxconn-idUSBRE82S19720120329
4)http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2415637,00.asp
5)Supply Chain for iPhone Highlights Costs in China (NY Times, July 5,
2010)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.