I spent the first part of my career with Ariba in the Spend
Management Services (SMS) Group, specifically Global Sourcing Operations (GSO). Several of the leaders of this division have
graduate educations from Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School of Business. Thought processes learned there trickled down
through our organization and one of those was lean services. This differs from lean manufacturing, but the
overwhelming mission was to provide the highest level of customer service
without sacrificing time, efforts, or adding supplementary work. It was also to develop a system for customer
feedback for constant improvement.
Our group had a Quality Management Team that helped create a
database of work instructions, best practices, checklists, and customer satisfaction
feedback. Team members then had a
responsibility to the overall sourcing project led by the Project Manager (PM). The PM was the communicator to the customer
and kept tabs on each team member through assigned hours and checklists. Other team members managed the category for
which the project fell into, the data which created pricing for the project,
and the Supplier Manager owned all outside communication. The work instructions almost ‘dummy proofed’
the project so that no work overlapped and everyone knew each other’s role and responsibility. The process also was hot swappable; for
example if capacity sifted for a data manager, another could fill the
role. As focus points changed, Rapid
Improvements were conducted to rewrite the work instructions so that advances
could be made and lessons learned.
All of these documents were daunting to keep up with and
sometimes questions arose around a drop in productivity to improve the process.
This reinforced leadership’s goals of
the importance of the lean service methodology.
Ultimately customers were interested in starting up their own Excellence
Centers within their organization to mimic the structure of Ariba’s Sourcing
Operations. It also made this group
attractive to other consulting agencies that are hired to act as Business
Process Outsourcing .
While services are different than manufacturing, the thought
process was the same. Internally think
of all the steps and resources needed to deliver a high quality sourcing
project. Create roles and responsibilities
around these parts that are scalable. Set
up a backbone of documentation for everyone to learn and follow that does not
allow for much variation outside of the initial scope. Finally, document feedback from customers to improve
the process through root cause analysis.
Some of the common criticisms that existed in our workplace were
around independent thought and the hiring of entry level workers. I personally had no problem with hiring young
men and women with bachelor’s degrees as long as they had potential. All of the tools to be successful were right
in front of them from day one. Managers just had to be careful to hire the
right person so they can progress into other roles with more responsibility. The other area of concern was the allowance
of creativity. It was preferred that
individuals or teams not sway too far from the checklists, work instructions,
and best practices. Many meetings were
held when team members were out of context, especially when it led to a failure
in customer service.
Until this point I did not understand how lean methodology
could be applied outside of manufacturing, but the common themes are
universal. I would like to think that
other best in class customer service centers have applied such processes. Other industries could be software
development or hospital administration.
I’m curious to understand other goods and services that are produced
through lean procedures – does anyone out there have a case study applied
outside of manufacturing?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.