Earlier in the course we watched a video about Herman Miller
furniture, and the synergy between their design and company visions. You may
recall that a point of major focus for Herman Miller is environmental
sustainability. The video even provided an anecdote of the Herman Miller honey,
which resulted from a decision the company had to make about how to deal with a
wasp infestation when they moved into their new building. This example showed
how sometimes the most optimal decision can also be the most environmentally
friendly—in this case choosing to colonize bees over paying for pesticides was
not only the sustainable option, but the option which in the long run proved
more profitable (they now produce their own honey and can offer this honey to
customers).
The following article from theEnvironmentalLeader.com (https://www.environmentalleader.com/2014/01/21/lean-manufacturing-yields-green-results/)
explains “the
traditional way of thinking goes that ‘green’ business initiatives add costs,
while implementing ‘lean’ processes is about streamlining and saving money”. While this may be the common sentiment, this viewpoint may
actually be quite flawed. Businesses often view green initiatives as costly
because of the investment in change and possible upfront costs, which are also
very present when switching to a lean manufacturing process. Upon closer
inspection, the two philosophies are actually quite similar, as they are rooted
in waste reduction. The article identifies seven key ways in which a lean
process is also environmentally favorable: fewer product defects, less
overproduction, minimizing wasted movement, reducing transportation, less
excess inventory, reduced waiting, and less over-processing. With these in
mind, hopefully it will become easier and easier for companies to do what is
best for them and their process while making the right choices for the
environment .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.