Enough has
been said about the role of technology in the world of product
supply chains. Yet the fever of brainstorming the pros and cons of including
technology within the supply chain systems of the world seems to be ceaseless
in its endurance. The positive impact, though unquestionable, still remains a subject
of discussion because of the big question – “how much is ‘too much’” still
remains the big question. Calls for minimizing complex IT integration, improving
business acumen to make on the go decisions, improving decision maker
interaction, enabling effective network management to reduce production lead
times have been doing the rounds on one half of the sphere. The other half is
making waves with innovators constantly bringing in ideas from all quarters,
squeezing it into the system, checking up what it what it digests and what it throws
out and contributing further out-of-the-box
theories.
Companies
like Triple Point Technology (on the technology solutions supply end) provide
real-time solutions to address the volatility and variability in the supply
chain cycle catering to better inventory management. They base their services
on advanced analytics and facilitate complete market solutions that understand
the nuances based on historical evidence, hence supporting statistically favorable
decisions. The rising tide keeps up its pace in the demand side as well. O’Neill,
a surfwear company, more than half a century old, trended towards an electronic
commerce server (Liaison Technologies) to take care of its challenges in
inventory logistics. The list grows and it is not surprising to see technology giants
like Bosch (out-of-stock verification software) and Philips (inventory turnover
and delivery reliability solutions) get appended to the roster.
Yet this is
only the mellifluous side of the story of a selected few out of the huge pool
of organizations that are struggling to make a mark. The struggle is not
because of the lack of resources but because of the inefficiency in leveraging the
right resources. The last two decades have seen exponential growth in
technology solutions. This has only meant confusion among the organizations as
to what to pick and how to use. Despite the rise of service oriented sales on
this front (as discussed above) the selection of technology has pushed upper
level management to the point of thinking if adopting these multifarious
technologies is just a fancy disposition.
However, the
point that I feel is missing in all this noise is the possible fact that
companies might have forgotten that technology (irrespective of its
application) is yet another tool. The reason why I feel this missing is there
continues to be too much panic and less entrepreneurial mindset. If at all technology
is seen as yet another tool it could have been approached for its use in inventory
management using a test-fail-learn approach or employ innovative methods to
select the right technology. For example, idea of assessing technology using
yet another analysis [IEEE, 3] is an innovative perspective. I believe such a position
helps us see the entire picture by taking a step backward. It is only
unfortunate that such theories or ideas or still only on paper but not running
as live wires. Once such thoughts get the right playground, companies will
naturally make the right decisions and right choices and not have second
thoughts about the role technology could play within their setup.
How does a
company’s vision and mission influence its decision making process with respect
to supply chain management? How much scope are organizations of this technology
cum simulation era give themselves to learn by “innovate and fail” process?
References:
1. 1. http://www.bosch-si.com/solutions/retail-logistics/supply-chain-management/scm-preventing-out-of-stocks.html
2. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03519usen/GBE03519USEN.PDF
3. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6093449
4. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ups/2013/04/09/to-streamline-your-business-look-no-further-than-your-inventory/
5. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/solutions/pdfs/PhilipsFinal-1111.pdf
6. https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/supply_chain_management_consumer_products_gma_supply_chain_benchmarking_2012/
7. www.mckinsey.com/insights/operations/building_a_flexible_supply_chain_for_uncertain_times
9. http://www.procurementleaders.com/supplier-directory/silver-partners-3/triple-point-technology
2. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03519usen/GBE03519USEN.PDF
3. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6093449
4. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ups/2013/04/09/to-streamline-your-business-look-no-further-than-your-inventory/
5. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/solutions/pdfs/PhilipsFinal-1111.pdf
6. https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/supply_chain_management_consumer_products_gma_supply_chain_benchmarking_2012/
7. www.mckinsey.com/insights/operations/building_a_flexible_supply_chain_for_uncertain_times
9. http://www.procurementleaders.com/supplier-directory/silver-partners-3/triple-point-technology
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.