When it
comes to improving operational processes, Chipotle has consistently been one
high-profile company consistently dedicated to improving customer service, and
for this Mexican fast food chain, that means reducing its long wait times. In a
2011 interview with CNBC host Jim Cramer, Chipotle CFO Jack Hartung summarizes
Chipotle’s approach when he says, “We pride ourselves on having great customer
service and that includes great through put and we can serve a lot of customers…but
we can serve them in a friendly and a fast way, but we think we can be even
faster.”[i]
By
2014, Chipotle stock continued to soar even as other fast food chains
floundered. Business Insider lists Chipotle’s aggressive approach to reducing
wait times as one of the four reasons for the company’s continued success.[ii]
However, it’s important to note that, as Chipotle is a national chain with
hundreds of locations throughout the United States, a one-size fits all
approach to improving operational process will not work.
Take the
following two examples: The Chipotle outside of Eastern Market station in
Washington D.C. versus the Chipotle in Columbus, Ohio on 2260 S National Rd. I
was a customer at the D.C. location every day from May 26th, 2014 to
August 20th, 2014 between the hours of 6:00 – 7:00 pm, and it did
not take a scientific study to identify the bottleneck at this location: The
cash register. Everyday, customers would line to the entrance, and wait times
took between 20 – 30 minutes. The cash register would usually have numerous
orders queued up, while workers sat idle at the food making stations. Customers
would often leave the store after opening the door.
The
Columbus Chipotle profiled in the article “Chipotle-Queuing System” has a very
different problem. There are five stations in Chipotle’s single queue system: The
burrito making station, the rice & meat station, the salsa & toppings
station, the wrapping & pricing station and the cash register. At this
particular Chipotle, the capacity utilization of the cash register was 33%. The
bottleneck at this location was at the salsa & salad station. According to
this case study, adding an additional worker to the salsa & salad would
double register utilization to 66%, but the bottleneck would still persist.[iii]
Given
the variation between different locations performing literally the exact same
job, how best can regional and national managers improve operational processes
in a way that actually increases customer satisfaction? While it seems that
Chipotle could benefit from improvement to conformance quality, given the high
turnover rate of the fast food business, variation is likely to persist.
Perhaps by training all of their local managers to be “scientists” dedicated to
process improvements through the scientific method a la Toyota, Chipotle could
further reduce wait times even given the immense regional variability in
bottlenecks. Ultimately, the questions a corporation should ask itself are, “How
much control is headquarters comfortable with giving up to local managers, and
through what methods and practices can HQ best ensure that that trust is not
misplaced?”
[i]
Sandholm, Drew. “Chipotle Seeks to Reduce Long Lines.” CNBC. July 20, 2011.
Retrieved from: http://www.cnbc.com/id/43825771#.
[ii]
Lutz, Ashley. “4 Reasons Chipotle is Destroying Fast Food.” Business Insider. September 4, 2014.
Retrieved from: http://www.businessinsider.com/chipotle-threatens-fast-food-chains-2014-9
[iii]
Sahni, Rahul. “Chipotle-Queuing System.” Academia.edu.
Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/5191558/Chipotle-Queuing_System
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.