During the first week, we were introduced to supply chains. Since I transferred into the class late, I
missed the lecture, but from reading the slides I learned so much about the
concept of a supply chain and it became visible to me in everyday life. I began
to see supply chains reflected in everything, from the food I buy in the
grocery store to the mass-produced clothes I wear every day. However, even after this, I still perceived
supply chains as being in somewhat of a vacuum, isolated and unaffected by
outside occurrences. However, this
article reminded me that like everything else, supply chains can be affected by
outside events.
This article touches on the risks associated with global
supply chains. Briefly, for 18 months
these risks decreased, however as global crises (like the Ebola virus and the
conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East) escalate, experts were beginning to worry
about these risks rising again.
Most people overlook the danger associated with
non-threatening systems that are regularly given access to exclusive events,
companies, and government organizations. Supply chains can be used as
mechanisms to spread not only business related supplies, but also as mechanisms
of war and oppression. Food supply
chains can be cut off from certain areas as a tactic to starve a perceived
enemy. Supply chain can be used to
transport weapons and spread disease during times of war. These are just a couple of examples.
As a
result, I am beginning to think of supply chain safety. What precautions are taken to ensure that the
products being transported are always safe? Is it standard practice for
companies to map out every possible route for their supply chains in case one
or even two routes are shut down?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.