Last week there was a discussion in class regarding how ideas
like “Lean” and “TPS” could be implemented in the government organizations, especially
where it is almost impossible to layoff or force people to change their way of
working. With almost nine years of working for government and implementing
various technology driven systems in government organizations I would like to
discuss further on the topic by illustrating a recent example.
Pakistan Customs has shifted to a paperless environment from
the typical traditional setup involving a lot of movement of case files from
one office to another. Implementing this new setup was not at all an easy job but
was very much needed to improve the efficiency of the customs clearance system
and movement of traded goods. The major obstacles included an IT illiterate
workforce, lack of infrastructure and a strong culture to resist change. It was
easy to deal with the infrastructure as that only demanded money and time but
the most difficult to deal with were the people and culture.
I was to lead implementation of this change in one fourth of
the country including twenty different formations with a workforce of more than
two thousand field officers and staff. I did get a feel of unease when I
started working on the layouts to make necessary changes in the physical
infrastructure and as the time passed I realized that the biggest obstacle will
be my own people – to get rid of whom was not at all an option. When I started
to discuss the idea of change and the positive effects the government was
expecting by its implementation I was bombarded by all negative arguments that
one could think of related to the new system and change itself with a strong
belief that this will all fail and as Prof. Zak said in the class – “you will
go and I will stay and keep on working the way I have been for years….” said by
one of the workers he encountered during his days at IBM. But again, as the new
management at Harley Davidson did I had to make them realize that it was a
matter of collective win or collective failure.
My strategy for successful implementation used the following
tools:
- - Testing of the new program to improve them by making user friendly
- - Repeated trainings of officers and field force at all levels
- - Professional demonstrations with individual attention
- - Mock testing using various simulations
- - Displaying the name of new system at all field formations to make people believe the seriousness
- - Regular discussions at all levels to make everyone believe that it is not an option to opt out and to make everyone own the project.
These all efforts were made side-by-side with the development
of infrastructure which equipped me with a willing and trained workforce by the
time the system was ready to be launched. Once it started, rather before it was
actually launched, I started receiving requests from the field staff to be
selected for the first run of the new system. These were the same people who
were the biggest resistors in the beginning but now they wanted to become the
foremost part of it. How did this all change? One short answer could be – by making
them a part of the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.